GreenWAM: A World Foundation Model for Robotics

A robot needs two things: a model that predicts what its actions will do, and a policy that picks the actions. This paper asks whether a single model can be both, for many different bodies at once.

Background

A robot needs a world model that predicts how its actions will change the scene, and a policy that chooses those actions. In practice these are built and evaluated separately, and each robot records its actions in its own format, so knowledge learned for prediction rarely flows into control and vice versa. The open question is whether one world model can serve both roles across different bodies, and what makes that work.

Core Innovation

GreenWAM is a world foundation model for robotics, together with the recipe that produces it. Three ingredients do the work. First, a shared anatomical action space describes 20 robot families, from bimanual arms to dexterous humanoids, in common joint coordinates, so heterogeneous bodies become comparable. Second, the model is trained jointly across those families in visual, action-conditioned and world-action modes. Third, policies are formed by splitting an action expert off the generator, giving each control interface its own pathway while sharing the underlying dynamics.

Results

• As a world model, GreenWAM reaches top-tier trajectory, depth and 3D accuracy on WorldArena 1.0, ahead of every world-action model and video generator in the comparison.
• As a policy, it lands among the top entries of the RoboTwin 2.0 leaderboard, attains the highest zero-shot LIBERO-plus success among the compared methods, and is competitive with dedicated vision-language-action and world-action policies on CALVIN and LIBERO.
• Adapted to a real humanoid, it succeeds more often than policies adapted from pi-0.5 and from Cosmos 3 Edge, and can be distilled into a single-step policy for real-time control.
• Controlled experiments yield three findings: robot specialization improves world prediction and control together; splitting off an action expert at the start of adaptation helps; and keeping world-model modes during policy adaptation preserves robustness to scene changes.

Limitations

The evidence is a spread of strong but relative placements: leading “among the compared methods” means the field baseline is the authors’ chosen set, and the margins are not given as a single decisive gap. The foundation-model claim rests on 20 families mapped into one joint space; how gracefully the action space extends to bodies outside that set is untested. Real-robot validation is a single humanoid and is reported qualitatively, without absolute success figures in the abstract. And the recipe’s core input is large-scale, multi-embodiment training data that most laboratories do not have, so reproducing the result is a data problem as much as a modeling one.

Industry Implications

A shared anatomical action space plus joint world/action training is the shape of an infrastructure layer for robotics: one model that both predicts and acts across many bodies. If it holds, the cost of bringing a new form factor online drops, because a new robot becomes an adaptation of a shared backbone rather than a from-scratch project. The single-step distillation matters commercially for real-time control on embedded hardware, where a multi-step generator is a liability. The strategic point is that the moat sits in the shared action space and the multi-embodiment corpus, not in any one robot.